Free Zed alternatives

Zed is in AI Code Editors & IDEs. It scored 6.8/10 in our tests. We list free or no-monthly-fee options first. Kiro is the highest-scoring tested free or no-monthly-fee alternative at 9.7/10. TRAE is recorded as requiring no card: Yes: TRAE IDE has limited monthly Auto-mode usage (no card claimed on docs). trae-agent OSS is free to self-host with your own model key.

Our record describes Zed as suited to: Developers who want a fast editor and are happy to bring their own model keys, including free OpenRouter models.. Recorded considerations: Generated HTML had two broken tags that made the app non-functional until fixed; Agent tried to start a blocking http.server twice; Linux needed a software-Vulkan launch script; update and sign-in banners cluttered the UI; Pro trial unavailable for GitHub accounts under 30 days.

Free or no-monthly-fee alternatives

Listed first because most people comparing alternatives want a free or no-card starting point. Scores are recorded overall scores from our tests, not one shared benchmark. Official limits can change; re-check the tool page dates.

1. #1 Kiro 9.7/10

   Tested: kiro-cli 2.37.1, Kiro Free (AWS Builder ID), model auto, agent v3 Default/vibe (not Spec) · 2026-11-02

   Free tier: Yes: perpetual Free with 50 credits/mo — Auto, Claude Sonnet 4.5/4.0, and open-weight models (DeepSeek 3.2, MiniMax M2.5/M2.1, GLM-5, Qwen3 Coder Next); flagship Claude Opus / Sonnet 5.5 / GPT-5.6 need a paid plan

   Three Free CLI T3 runs on 2026-11-02: each fixed the seeded cart.js discount bug so node --test passed 4/4 in 17–18s, leaving cart.test.js untouched and self-running the tests.

   Pros

   • 3/3 Free CLI T3 runs fixed the bug in 17–18s with 4/4 tests passing
   • Agent edited cart.js and ran node --test itself
   • Used only about 0.80 of 50 monthly Free credits for three runs ($0)

   Cons

   • Free is 50 credits/mo and excludes Claude Opus, Sonnet 5.5, and GPT-5.6
   • Official API keys / documented headless KIRO_API_KEY path need Pro or higher

   Best if: Developers who want a spec-driven agentic IDE/CLI from AWS, with a usable free tier for small tasks — and paid tiers that put several flagship models on one credit pool.

   Compare Zed vs Kiro

2. #2 TRAE 9/10

   Tested: trae-agent OSS CLI 0.1.0 with Google AI Studio gemini-3.5-flash-lite after a local one-line google_client role=user patch (BYOK, $0). Not TRAE IDE Auto mode · 2026-11-04

   Free tier: Yes: TRAE IDE has limited monthly Auto-mode usage (no card claimed on docs). trae-agent OSS is free to self-host with your own model key.

   trae-agent OSS CLI fixed our seeded cart discount bug in 3 of 3 runs (19–42s each) with a free Gemini key, never touched the test file.

   Pros

   • Fixed the seeded bug in 3/3 CLI runs with a free model
   • Did not modify the test file in any run
   • OSS self-host / BYOK path needs no TRAE IDE account

   Cons

   • Stock google_client uses role=tool and fails against current Gemini API until patched
   • Requires a trae_config.yaml; CLI flags alone are not enough without a config file

   Best if: Developers who want a ByteDance-built coding agent; IDE users get limited free Auto mode, and CLI users can self-host trae-agent with a free Gemini or OpenRouter key.

3. #3 Cursor 8.4/10

   Tested: Cursor 3.25.6 for Linux, Free Hobby plan, Agent with default model Cursor Grok 4.6 Medium · 2026-10-16

   Free tier: Yes: ongoing Free ($0) — limited Agent, Chat, and Tab with Cursor models (Grok and Composer); not a trial

   In one agent turn with no follow-ups, Cursor built our T1 todo app as a single index.html in about 2.5 minutes and tested it in its built-in browser.

   Pros

   • Working todo app in one turn, about 2.5 minutes, with no follow-ups
   • Every T1 check passed in our own headless browser test, including mobile
   • Tested its own work in a built-in browser

   Cons

   • On Linux it needed --no-sandbox and showed an OS keyring dialog on first launch
   • The agent ran commands without asking for approval by default

   Best if: Developers who want an AI-first VS Code-style editor with a built-in agent on Cursor models. Use Free to evaluate Agent on those models. Plus adds a larger weekly Cursor-model pool and still has no third-party models and no own API keys. Premium and above is where the official docs put third-party models, Cloud Agents, Bugbot, and Origin.

   Compare Zed vs Cursor

4. #4 Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) 8.1/10

   Tested: Devin Desktop 3.10.67 (formerly Windsurf) for Linux, Free plan, model SWE-1.6 Slow, Local session · 2026-10-16

   Free tier: Yes: light agent quota, limited models, unlimited Tab completions and inline edits

   Devin Desktop, Cognition's renamed Windsurf editor, built our T1 todo app in about 1 minute with no follow-ups and previewed it after one 'Failed to start browser preview' error.

   Pros

   • Working todo app in about 1 minute with no follow-ups
   • Every T1 check passed in our own headless browser test, including mobile
   • Previewed its own work in a built-in browser

   Cons

   • On Linux the devin:// login link failed; we had to paste an auth token manually
   • Sessions defaulted to Cloud, which is Pro-only; we switched to Local

   Best if: Developers who liked Windsurf and want Cognition's agentic editor, with a free tier for light use.

5. #5 GitHub Copilot 8/10

   Tested: VS Code 1.142.0 for Linux with built-in GitHub Copilot, Copilot Free plan, model Auto (routed to gpt-6-luna) · 2026-10-16

   Free tier: Yes: Copilot Free with an allowance of GitHub AI Credits, 2,000 completions/mo, Auto model only (CLI and agent mode included)

   Our first chat (Auto routed to GPT-5 mini) failed 3 times with 'Sorry, no response was returned'.

   Pros

   • Every T1 check passed in our own headless browser test, including mobile
   • Tested its own work with Playwright in VS Code's built-in browser
   • Built into VS Code; Copilot Free needs no payment

   Cons

   • The first chat failed 3 times with 'Sorry, no response was returned' and needed a restart
   • Needed two approvals to open a browser page and run Playwright

   Best if: Developers already in VS Code and GitHub who want a built-in agent with a free starter tier.

   Compare Zed vs GitHub Copilot

6. T3 Code Not yet tested

   Free tier: Yes: the app is free and open source; you need at least one installed and signed-in coding agent

   Open-source control surface for the coding agents already on your machine: drive Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Grok Build, OpenCode and Antigravity from one desktop, web or mobile app.

   Best if: Developers who use several coding agents or machines and want one GUI, including a phone app, to run and watch all their agent sessions.

7. ThinkRail (JetBrains) Not yet tested

   Free tier: Yes: the app is free and open source; you need a model provider (JetBrains AI or your own credentials)

   JetBrains' open-source agentic IDE built around the pi coding agent: each workspace is its own git worktree, with Monaco editor tabs, terminals, live diffs and a spec graph the agent reads and maintains.

   Best if: Developers who want to run several coding-agent sessions in parallel, each isolated on its own git branch, inside a lightweight IDE.

How Zed compares

Zed scored 6.8/10. Kiro is the highest-scoring tested free or no-monthly-fee alternative at 9.7/10 (difference 2.9 points).

Back to Zed · Zed free-tier test · Best free AI Code Editors & IDEs · Best AI Code Editors & IDEs

FAQ

Scores come from our own tests and are never for sale; sponsored placements are always labelled. Some links are affiliate links (currently Railway). Disclosure