Free Greptile alternatives

Greptile is in Code Review & Security. It scored 7.8/10 in our tests. We list free or no-monthly-fee options first. Sourcery is the highest-scoring tested free or no-monthly-fee alternative at 8.8/10.

Our record describes Greptile as suited to: Developers and teams who want codebase-aware AI reviews on GitHub pull requests.. Recorded considerations: Didn't auto-review an already-open PR; needed an '@greptileai review' comment; Missed a null access bug; Hardcoded API key mentioned only in the header, not as a finding; Every finding was labelled P1, so severity wasn't useful; Pro is $30 per seat per month after the trial.

Free or no-monthly-fee alternatives

Listed first because most people comparing alternatives want a free or no-card starting point. Scores are recorded overall scores from our tests, not one shared benchmark. Official limits can change; re-check the tool page dates.

1. #1 Sourcery 8.8/10

   Tested: Sourcery GitHub app, Team trial then Open Source plan, benchmark R1 · 2026-10-16

   Free tier: Yes: free for open-source repos

   On our seeded R1 pull request with 6 planted bugs, Sourcery caught all 6 with sensible severities, including the SQL injection and, through its secret scanner, the hardcoded key.

   Pros

   • Caught all 6 planted bugs with sensible severities
   • Secret scanner flagged the hardcoded key
   • Free forever on public repositories, including security checks

   Cons

   • Didn't auto-review an already-open PR; needed an '@sourcery-ai review' comment
   • Rewrote the PR description automatically

   Best if: Open-source maintainers and small teams who want thorough AI reviews and security checks on GitHub or GitLab.

   Compare Greptile vs Sourcery

2. #2 CodeRabbit 8.1/10

   Tested: CodeRabbit GitHub app, 14-day Advanced trial (no card), benchmark R1 · 2026-10-16

   Free tier: Yes: free reviews for public/OSS repos; Free plan has PR summaries (+ IDE/CLI reviews); 14-day Advanced trial

   On our seeded R1 pull request with 6 planted bugs, CodeRabbit posted a summary in 14s and a full review in about 2.5 minutes.

   Pros

   • Caught 4 of 6 planted bugs with correct severity and fixes, with 0 false positives
   • Fast: summary in 14 seconds, full review in about 2.5 minutes
   • Free reviews forever on public repositories

   Cons

   • Missed an obvious SQL injection
   • Flagged a hardcoded API key only as a trivial nitpick

   Best if: Teams and open-source maintainers who want fast, low-noise AI reviews on every GitHub pull request.

   Compare Greptile vs CodeRabbit

3. #3 Semgrep 8.1/10

   Tested: Semgrep Community Edition (open-source CLI, registry rules), not Semgrep AppSec Platform · 2026-10-16

   Free tier: Yes: up to 10 contributors

   Seeded-repo scan, 3 runs: 6/10 issues found, 0 false positives.

   Pros

   • Zero false positives across 3 scans of our seeded repo
   • Free for up to 10 contributors
   • Scans run locally from the CLI

   Cons

   • Found only 6 of 10 seeded issues
   • Missed hardcoded secrets, MD5, yaml.load and DOM XSS in our repo

   Best if: Teams that want a fast, low-noise static analysis baseline in CI.

   Compare Greptile vs Semgrep

4. #4 Snyk 5.6/10

   Tested: Snyk Free plan (Snyk Code + Open Source), GitHub app, benchmark R1 · 2026-10-16

   Free tier: Yes: Free plan at $0/month with access to SCA, SAST, IaC and Container and published per-product test limits (Open Source 200 tests; Code 100; IaC 300; Container 100 — official FAQ, 2026-11-12).

   Snyk is a SAST and security scanner, not a general AI reviewer.

   Pros

   • Very fast: commented about 9 seconds after the PR opened
   • Flagged the hardcoded API key as High with a CWE reference
   • 0 false positives

   Cons

   • Caught only 1 of 6 planted bugs; it doesn't look for general logic bugs
   • Missed a SQL injection whose query was built but never executed

   Best if: Teams that want automated security scanning (code, dependencies, IaC, containers) in CI, alongside a separate AI reviewer for logic bugs.

5. MergeAtlas Not yet tested

   Free tier: Yes: MIT open source (mergeatlas.dev, verified 2026-11-10)

   Skill for your coding agent plus a small Python script that maps a pull request before you read the diff: the intent behind each file change, why each file changed, the PR's scope, and files outside the PR that its changes affect.

   Best if: Developers reviewing pull requests largely written by AI agents who want intent and blast radius before reading lines.

6. Plannotator Not yet tested

   Free tier: Yes: Apache-2.0 open source, runs locally (GitHub README, verified 2026-11-09)

   Local, browser-based review surface for AI coding agents (Claude Code, Codex, Copilot CLI, Gemini CLI, OpenCode, Kiro, Droid, Amp, Pi).

   Best if: Developers who want to mark up agent plans and diffs and feed comments back to Claude Code, Codex and similar agents.

Other tested alternatives

These have a recorded test score but are not listed as a free plan or no-monthly-fee option on our records.

5. #5 Qodo 7.5/10

   Tested: pr-agent OSS CLI 0.49.0 plain-diff (--diff-file) + Google AI Studio gemini-3.5-flash-lite (BYOK, $0). Not Qodo Cloud / IDE · 2026-11-05

   Free tier: pr-agent OSS: yes (self-host + BYOK free model). Qodo Cloud: no permanent free tier; 14-day trial; free for qualified OSS repos.

   Caught 3–4 of 6 planted bugs per run (avg Outcome 5.6).

   Pros

   • OSS CLI works headless with --diff-file and a free Gemini key ($0)
   • Caught SQL injection and missing await in all 3 runs
   • 0 false positives across runs

   Cons

   • Never caught the null-access getUserName bug in any run
   • Off-by-one and isEven findings were inconsistent across runs

   Best if: Teams that want an open-source, BYOK PR reviewer they can run in CI or locally; not a substitute for scoring Qodo Cloud quality.

How Greptile compares

Greptile scored 7.8/10. Sourcery is the highest-scoring tested free or no-monthly-fee alternative at 8.8/10 (difference 1.0 points).

Back to Greptile · Greptile free-tier test · Best free Code Review & Security · Best Code Review & Security

FAQ

Scores come from our own tests and are never for sale; sponsored placements are always labelled. Some links are affiliate links (currently Railway). Disclosure